Skip to content

Five Anthologies Based on Classic SF Magazines

0
Share

Five Anthologies Based on Classic SF Magazines - Reactor

Home / Five Anthologies Based on Classic SF Magazines
Book Recommendations Science Fiction

Five Anthologies Based on Classic SF Magazines

By

Published on October 16, 2023

0
Share

Suppose for the moment that you are the editor of a science fiction and/or fantasy magazine. By the nature of magazines, each issue is ephemeral, removed from racks at the end of the month. However, there is an entire parallel ecosystem of books, which stay on shelves much longer. Is it possible to attract new customers—book-buying customers—while still selling lots of magazines?

The answer is, of course, to produce an anthology drawn exclusively from the pages of one’s magazine. Judicious selection of title will make it clear that the source was your magazine. Paperbacks might last on shelves longer than any magazine. Hardcovers last much longer and offer the tantalizing possibility that libraries might purchase them.

Although the identity of the magazine that offered the first magazine-themed anthology is lost to time, the practice was well-established by the 1950s. You might want to look up the five following anthologies, particularly if you think you might enjoy some older stories that are new to you.

 

The Astounding Science Fiction Anthology, edited by John W. Campbell, Jr. (1952)

Campbell offered SF-curious readers an amazing astonishing astounding 583 pages of material drawn from the pages of Astounding, all for a mere four dollars (about $30 USD today; still a good deal). Since this anthology was not an annual, Campbell was not limited to stories drawn from the most recent calendar year. Most stories are from the 1940s; understandable, as the ’50s were barely under way. Equally unsurprising, while there are some stories that are not immediately familiar, the table of contents offers such classics such as “Nightfall,” “Clash by Night,” “E for Effort,” “Thunder and Roses,” and “The Witches of Karres,” titles that evoke good memories to those of us of a certain age. The anthology makes a solid case for reading Astounding…or at least the Astounding of the 1940s.

 

Galaxy Reader of Science Fiction, edited by H. L. Gold (1952)

Gold’s anthology is almost as long as Campbell’s, clocking in at 566 pages. Sorted by increasing implausibility, beginning with almost mundane narratives before building towards outré tales, the anthology is almost as rich as the Astounding anthology in classics. It includes oft-anthologized works like “The Stars are the Styx” and “Betelgeuse Bridge.” Galaxy first hit the stands in 1950, which means that Gold had at most a dozen and a half issues from which to select stories. The fact that he was able to assemble this many worthwhile stories from so few issues should have been a warning to Astounding: Galaxy would soon eclipse the older magazine in the decade to come.

 

The Best from Fantasy and Science Fiction, edited by Anthony Boucher and J. Francis McComas (1952)

At just 214 pages, Boucher and McComas’s volume is considerably thinner than either Campbell’s or Gold’s. This is not because F&SF had had a shorter run than Galaxy (although it was significantly younger than Astounding); F&SF was actually slightly older than Galaxy. It is because Boucher and McComas focused on recent issues of F&SF, delivering something close to an actual annual. This judicious approach paid off; this was the first of at least two dozen volumes drawn from F&SF’s pages.

 

Lambda 1 and Other Stories, edited by John Carnell (1964)

I’d love to be able to discuss Carnell’s 1955 The Best from New Worlds Science Fiction here, but I’ve never seen a copy. I suspect it never made it to Canada (or the US). As Carnell complains in the introduction to this volume, American SF tended to eclipse British publications. Successful British authors were (and are) often better known for their US publications than they were for their British works. When Lambda 1 was published, it had been a decade since a collection of British material had been put together. As the editor of New Worlds, which was a generation old when he grumpily composed his essay, this was a particular sore point for Carnell. It’s rather odd, therefore, that unlike the Campbell, the Gold, or the Boucher & McComas anthologies, Lambda 1’s title does not make clear that these stories are drawn from New Worlds Science Fiction, although they are.

The most recognizable name in the table of contents is Michael Moorcock, whose “Flux” offers revelations about the nature of time that would be of no comfort to time travelers. Moorcock was, of course, Carnell’s successor, under whom the magazine would become a bastion of New Wave SF.

 

The Best Science Fiction from Worlds of If Magazine, edited by Frederik Pohl (1964)

If survived the American News Company’s extinction event by becoming Galaxy’s junior step-sibling, the magazine to which obscurer authors were consigned. One might expect the result would be a second-rate magazine, but in fact the magazine’s status gave stories a freedom Galaxy’s more closely scrutinized stories may have lacked. If was a frequent Best Professional Magazine Hugo finalist, winning in 1966, 1967 and 1968. This anthology draws from early in If’s golden age under Pohl, offering such delights as one of the earliest of Saberhagen’s Berserker stories.

***

 

Even though the last sixty-plus years have been a hard time for magazines (particularly during the extinction event that followed American News Company’s 1957 liquidation), three or four of the five magazines mentioned above survive in one form or another to the present day. Do anthologies like the above facilitate survival? Given the recent catastrophic loss of Amazon’s Newstand, today’s magazine publishers may be pondering such strategies.

In the words of fanfiction author Musty181, four-time Hugo finalist, prolific book reviewer, and perennial Darwin Award nominee James Davis Nicoll “looks like a default mii with glasses.” His work has appeared in Interzone, Publishers Weekly and Romantic Times as well as on his own websites, James Nicoll Reviews (where he is assisted by editor Karen Lofstrom and web person Adrienne L. Travis) and the 2021, 2022, and 2023 Aurora Award finalist Young People Read Old SFF (where he is assisted by web person Adrienne L. Travis). His Patreon can be found here.

About the Author

James Davis Nicoll

Author

In the words of fanfiction author Musty181, current CSFFA Hall of Fame nominee, six-time Hugo finalist, prolific book reviewer, Beaverton contributor, and perennial Darwin Award nominee James Davis Nicoll “looks like a default mii with glasses.” His work has appeared in Interzone, Publishers Weekly and Romantic Times as well as on his own websites, 2025 Aurora Award finalist James Nicoll Reviews (where he is assisted by editor Karen Lofstrom and web person Adrienne L. Travis) and the 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, and 2026 Aurora Award finalist Young People Read Old SFF (where he is assisted by web person Adrienne L. Travis). His Patreon can be found here.
Learn More About James
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
ecbatan
2 years ago

New Worlds continues to be occasionally revived in some form or another — I haven’t seen the PS Publishing version but I know that earlier revivals of New Worlds in anthology form would include an issue number internally — as part of the copyright notice, usually. You can see this in the David Garnett series from the ’90s. (I was rather fond of the couple of New Worlds anthologies co-edited by Hilary Bailey in the 1970s, which arrived in the US with confusingly different numbers and slightly different contents than the UK versions.) Given that Interzone seems all but dead, perhaps it’s time for another New Worlds revival!

There is a curious example of an anthology derived from the pages of a single SF magazine that didn’t EXPLICITLY announce that it was sourced from a single magazine but kind of sneakily did: Great Science Fiction Adventures, edited by Larry Shaw (Lancer, 1963) comprises four novellas from the 1956-1958 run of Science Fiction Adventures, edited not so coincidentally by Larry Shaw (who had moved on to Lancer after Science Fiction Adventures folded.)

When I was a kid I eagerly read the Best of F&SF and Galaxy Reader anthologies from the library — but I don’t think I ever saw the first huge Galaxy Reader.

 

 

sturgeonslawyer
2 years ago

I only see three continuing to this day, and that’s only if you count New Worlds. Last I heard Galaxy and If were both really and sincerely dead.

Tim
Tim
2 years ago

 “If survived the American New Company’s extinction event” should read “News”, which was shown in the occurrences lower down.

Stefan Raets
Admin
2 years ago

@6 – Fixed, thanks!

Brian Collins
2 years ago

We could use annual anthologies for the exclusively online ‘zines, but it might not be financially viable. Lightspeed had an anthology comprising all the short fiction published in their first year, but then no continuation. Uncanny has a best-of anthology book, but that’s a limited edition (also a few years out of date). Would be a shame if the only way one could access all the fiction of these ‘zines is the Wayback Machine.

ryozenzuzex
2 years ago

There’s a Best of Interzone, although it’s still hanging around in my TBR pile.

AndyLove
2 years ago

The annual Galaxy Readers were very important to me. When I got hold of The Fourth Galaxy Reader (in 2011 or so) to read “Man of Distinction” by Shaara (a story I had struggled for ages to identify), I was delighted to find out that every one of the stories in that book was somewhat familiar to me, due to faint memories from 1976.

Bill Higgins-- Beam Jockey

In my teenage years, I became fond of the numbered Analog anthologies, plus Prologue to Analog (beginning with the stash in my high school’s library).

I began with Analog 6 (1968), which contained Vernor Vinge’s “Bookworm, Run!” (his second sale), Keith Laumer’s short-short “Prototaph” with its final-sentence punchline, and J. E. Enever’s intriguing nonfiction “Giant Meteor Impact,” all of which remain memorable decades afterward.

At bottom, beneath a thin veneer of sophistication, I am an Analog type of reader. So I found much to enjoy in these books.

Bill Higgins-- Beam Jockey

13: Is it redundant to write “thin veneer?”

AndyLove
2 years ago

@13: I read a few of those, too (including the one with Prototaph)

@14: If this be veneer, make the most of it!

ecbatan
2 years ago

I was a reader of Ben Bova’s Analog as well, beginning in 1974. And for some reason — perhaps because I read the wrong one first! — I really never got into Campbell’s 1960s Analog anthologies. Until the last couple of decades, when I made an effort to read at least some back issues of Analog, and stuff by writers I’d ignored, like Mack Reynolds, pretty much the only ’60s Analog writers I was familiar with were Poul Anderson and Randall Garrett, and him only for the Lord Darcy stories. Even James Schmitz had to wait for me to discover the Telzey stories.

And while I found some good stuff in ’60s Analog issues, I also found some pretty terrible stuff, like Verge Foray.

ecbatan
2 years ago

I think the one Analog anthology I read was Analog 2 (which did have a Telzey story) — because I vaguely remember the cover, and “The Weather Man” by Theodore Thomas. I see now that it had a story by Allen Kim Lang, who is still alive at age 95, and published a story in Analog as recently as 2020. I was very surprised when he sent me a submission for my Year’s Best anthology several years ago. (His first story appeared in Planet Stories in 1950!)

krad
2 years ago

The timing of this piece is amusing (as is James’s comment #3), considering that Weird Tales: 100 Years of Weird was just last week released by Blackstone Publishing.

http://weirdtales.com/100th

It’s a mix of new material and reprints of classic WT stories.

—Keith R.A. DeCandido

 

 

krad
2 years ago

James: I’m inordinately proud of my story in the anthology, and I’m also deeply honored to be in the same tome as all the other luminaries in this book (both current and classic).

—Keith R.A. DeCandido